A chat with publisher Skylight Press

Skylight_smallsquareThis week I’m delighted to welcome my publishers Skylight Press to my blog. Daniel and Rebsie from Skylight have kindly agreed to answer a few questions about what they look for in manuscripts and give a few words of advice to aspiring writers who are looking to get their work published. I feel I’ve been very lucky to work with Skylight as they clearly really care about the books they publish and are in it for the right reasons. If you want to find out more about them check out their website here. Also – if you want to see what type of book they publish, then why not read my book Song of the Sea God.

What motivates you to be a publisher, and why do you publish the type of books you do?

Quite simply, we do it because we love it. It is our shared dream to make beautiful books, both in design and content. It is a lot of work and it takes a great deal of our time but we are wholly committed. A lot of presses go by the way because they take on too much, try to grow too fast, or have not converted to a more cost-effective mode of publishing.

While we love to publish new and exciting works we also sensible in what we can and can’t do, sometimes having to painfully pass on opportunities for purely practical reasons. But our vision is simple – we are looking for books with a spark – whether literary or esoteric. While the genres we publish are wonderful in their own separate way we love to explore unique overlaps. We have a wonderful line of creative esoteric fiction – many of our esoteric titles are scholarly with literary appeal – our visionary poets and experimental novelists often cross over into the esoteric realm with incantatory language and bardic vision. As Alan Moore often likes to say – Art is Magic and Magic is Art

We love making beautiful print books – but we also provide Ebooks and try to maintain a presence in the computer-based world. Perhaps we are the only press thus far to specialise in both literary and esoteric texts but we’re not really concerned with classifications and pigeonholing – we do what we do for the love of it – and if that represents something bold and new, so be it.

Why do you feel it important to publish the type of fiction you do? Why do novels matter to you?

As our website states we publish literary novels rather than commercial or genre fiction novels but we appreciate that the definitions of such are often subjective – and distinctions between the three aren’t always clear and concise. Loosely, we value fiction that prioritises voice, language or literary device above plot, setting and lowest common denominator marketability.

We feel that there are hundreds of presses that publish commercial plot-driven fiction, whether big publishing houses or small ‘vanity presses,’ but far fewer that dare to publish challenging literary works, often from lesser known and harder to market authors. Most commercial presses are overly concerned with the quick and viral impact of an author over a wide demographic, whereas we are less concerned with such an explosion of initial sales but rather the staying power of good writing craft and a unique voice.

This aesthetic allows us to explore visionary poetry and interesting hybrids, as well as experimental or avant garde fiction. Although we are an international press with authors around the globe we especially look for British fiction, as there are far fewer opportunities for British authors compared to their American counterparts.

Tell me about the submissions process and the type of  submissions you get – are they from authors directly or through agents?

We do deal with agents – but whether a writer has one or not just doesn’t make any difference to our decision to publish something. The writing is all that matters in our decision making process – agents, credentials, academic standing, beautiful query letters, self demagoguery, etc., are of little to no concern to us. In this aspect we might represent a departure from the norm in the publishing business but we are only concerned with good writing and the qualities of the text in question.

Despite making this clear on our website we still get inundated with all sorts of submissions well outside of our remit. This can be time consuming but we are hip to all the tricks and can separate the chaff quite easily – but always taking the time to offer a personal response to serious submissions. It really is quite a collection: pure spam, mass email pitches, real and fake agents, dubious middle-men merchants, self-publishers, re-issue requesters, translators, real and fake academics, self-help copyists, school children, pseudonyms, prophets, manifesto writers, authors of the not quite written yet – just to name a few.

The texts are all over the place too – sometimes little to no editing, poorly translated, utterly inappropriate, or just too long and sprawling beyond the practicality of publication.

Having said this, we do get wonderful texts and hear from a number of diverse and interesting people, whether we take on their work or not. We also realise that the publishing industry is itself mostly responsible for many of the negative trends noted above. Authors are inundated with poor and outdated advice from a growing number of middle-men resource sites on the internet, some of which mean well and others of which just take advantage of the natural uncertainty that comes with being an author (often with a hefty fee). As authors ourselves we have a great deal of empathy for those seeking to publish and keep that at the forefront of all our dealings with them. Of course, we can’t be all things to all people and there are some authors looking for something beyond what we can offer as a small press. We completely understand this and do not try to sell ourselves to authors that clearly desire a bigger and more commercial press.

However, the internet has been a great equaliser in the publishing world and our distribution is on a par with many larger presses, allowing us to attract writers that we perhaps wouldn’t have been able get in an earlier era. The authors that do publish with us seem to appreciate our publishing model for what it is and the honesty with which we present ourselves.

What advice would you give someone looking to get published – what should they do to improve their chances?

It’s always a precarious business giving advice to writers aspiring to be published – for various reasons. Firstly, there is the danger of adding to the plethora of readily available bad advice being tossed around the internet. Everyone and their dog seems to do advice lists like “10 things you must do in order to get published.” Also, stock advice does not normally speak to the minor differences between presses – or in fact the massive chasm between commercial publishing and small press (or Indie) publishing. We can only advise from the standpoint of our own press aesthetic, which may or may not represent that of other small presses.

The most important thing – and this is something that many advice lists overlook – produce a work of excellence. This seems obvious but as we are hammered with substandard, poorly written, badly edited and technically dubious scripts – anything less than excellent is going to be dispensed with very quickly. Specifically for us, the work must contain a “spark” of some kind – so voice is everything – even more than content, plot, setting, etc. We look for inspired voices – particularly with fiction and poetry – or work that achieves something unique through experimentation and risk. Straight ahead narratives with simplistic language are a penny a dozen – and so many books with wonderful subject matter and plot are undone by dreary and uninspired writing. This is why we specify “literary fiction” – and while we gladly admit that such a characterisation is debatable and largely subjective – “literary” usually alludes to something unique in the voice, in the language itself. For the same reason we generally shy away from conversational or what we sarcastically refer to as “shopping list poetry.” We look for some thing powerful in the poetic voice, something incantatory or shamanic in the language which sparks the imagination and gives poetry a catalytic function. This is not to say that other forms of poetry or fiction are bad – there are thousands of commercial or genre fiction presses that go for straight narrative fiction – and lots of poetry publishing houses that endorse the conversational or confessional style of poetry.

So our ethos follows Derrida’s famous line – “there is nothing but the text.” Therefore, an author should make the text or manuscript front and central in their initial contact.

While they may be important to other publishers, we are not impressed by degrees, academic standing, formally perfect query letters, promises of monetary success, literary awards or even how many books an author may have churned out. We assess the manuscript and the manuscript tells us all we need to know.

Of course, we appreciate meaningful introductions and some background information – but so many people waste their time with long CVs, references, or letters raving about professional standing. We live in an age where there are thousands of dubious literary prizes, where anyone can obtain and MFA in Creative Writing, and where the term ‘published author’ does not necessarily mean talented writer – so we ignore all the platitudes and assess the text only.

This all can be known if an author takes five minutes to look at the submission guidelines on our website, which points to another important point: Know your press. Almost every press has some sort of website with listed submission guidelines and yet 90% of submitting authors clearly haven’t read those guidelines. This is an immediate turn-off.

Beyond this, it may help to show a reasonable standard of grammatical proficiency, particularly with non-fiction submissions where a command of the subject matter is also necessary. As many genius writers throughout history have come with technical flaws, we may be willing to overlook errors in fiction or poetry manuscripts when the writing is clearly inspired or advanced.

Having said all this, there is also a large element of luck and timing involved. Most small presses can only produce so many books a year and have to make tough decisions over manuscripts of merit. We at Skylight have had to make many a painful decision due to time constraints or other parameters like book-length.

This is especially true of presses that become established, whereas new presses that need titles will tend to take more risks.

So an author seeking to be published needs to become thick-skinned and not take rejections personally, although we know that’s easier said than done. Remember some of the greatest books were rejected many times before someone dared to take them on. In the case of rejection we would advise an author to either improve their manuscript – or keep seeking publishers for whom it might be better suited.

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “A chat with publisher Skylight Press

  1. They sound like very decent publishers to work with. Do they pay royalties?! The main message appears to be that a distinctive voice and the quality of the material counts above all the flim-flam of breathless publicity.

      • That’s usually the way it is. I find that it’s not uncommon to spend 4 months researching and writing a chapter in an academic book. Then the publisher supplies you with one copy of the publication (typically worth about £30 secondhand). Writing is essentially altruistic.

  2. I am impressed by the integrity and clarity of their purpose. Kudos to you, Chris, that they have taken you on. Their standards seem to be very high, but that’s great!

    • I think I was lucky Val to find a publisher whose interests and vision matched my book. I think that’s a key point which comes out of the interview really – as they say ‘know your press’. If you’re determined and maybe a little lucky you can find the right publisher for your book.

    • I think publishers fight shy of saying it sometimes because it seems so obvious! But it’s clear from Skylight’s description of what they get presented it that it does need saying.

  3. A little late to the game here, but interesting information. There is no money in books unless you’re a NY Times bestseller. I wrote my book because I had to–I had to tell my story about my experience with using humor to battle breast cancer. That book would not stay in my head and heart no matter how hard I tried. It demanded to live on the page…

  4. What a breath of fresh air – this is the publisher I dream of getting my first novel published with. No beating around the bush and fancy frills – just good old fashioned values and the love of a solid story.

  5. Pingback: How to get more views on your blog | songoftheseagod

  6. Pingback: How to get 5,000 followers on Twitter, for free, part two | songoftheseagod

  7. Pingback: How to get 5000 followers on Twitter – without paying a penny! | songoftheseagod

  8. Pingback: Song of the Sea God by Chris Hill: A Publishing Journey | Daniel's Literary Endeavors

    • Ha – yes, me too. They seem to be doing ok, been going for a few years now. They don’t make themselves rich out of my book of course but they seem to have found a niche which works for them and for their authors.

  9. Interesting to read – I love that Daniel made the point so many of these articles don’t, ie, write a book worth publishing. I often think that is something that 70% of writers forget about when they’re trying to get published by a Big Five, or simply to sell they’re small press published or self-published book – is it good enough to make anyone want to do more than read the first couple of chapters and then abandon and forget about it? Which is all it’s about, really.

  10. Chris – please not that ‘they’re’ was a TYPO!!!!!!!!!!!! I meant ‘there’ small press or self-published book, of course. HA!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s